Benutzer:Rdiez/BuyingALightBulb
Aus /dev/tal
< Benutzer:Rdiez
Version vom 16. Mai 2014, 18:33 Uhr von Rdiez (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Buying a light bulb used to be easy)
Dies sind die persönlichen Benutzerseiten von rdiez, bitte nicht verändern! Ausnahmen sind nur einfache Sprachkorrekturen wie Tippfehler, falsche Präpositionen oder Ähnliches. Alles andere bitte nur dem Benutzer melden! |
Buying a light bulb used to be easy
Buying a light bulb used to be really easy, but that changed with the arrival of energy-saving models.
It is very hard to buy a quality light bulb. I have often bought from "good" brand names and got disappointed.
Here is a feature list:
- Brightness.
Unfortunately, the lumen values are not linear, especially from 2,000 Lumen. I don't know the maths. If you can help, please drop me a line. This is the table I have been using for reference:
Incasdencent Watt Lumen LED Watt Energy-saver Watt 40 400 8 60 720 80 1,000 20 100 1,200 150 1,700 200 10,000
- Color temperature. 2700K is best. 3000K might be described as "soft, warm white", but you'll notice the difference.
- Turn-on speed.
- Lifespan.
- Cycling endurance.
- Clear or frosted glass.
- Noise.
- Dimmable.
- Physical robustness.
- Operating temperature.
Compact fluorescent lamp (CFL)
I am particulary dissatisfied with compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) technology, especially after all the hype.
The many drawbacks are:
- Expensive.
- Slow to turn on.
- Often last much shorter als advertised, due to low cycling endurance.
- Noisy. Most CFLs make a humming noise that you may notice in a quiet environment.
- Cold light colour.
- Normally not dimmable.
- The light bulb itself is also ugly.
- Contain toxic mercury (quicksilver) which complicates their disposal.
- They turn darker with time.
On the bright side, they consume very little electricity.